A critical inverse relationship anywhere between LSAS ratings and you can earliest fixation course with the direct try receive, r (18) = –
To assess the first three hypotheses, Pearson’s correlations were used with partial correlations used to account for the effect of state anxiety (state score from the STAI . Tests of normality showed that all variables were normally distributed and hence suitable for this parametric test, except for the following: fixation count to head and body, dwell time to the head and background and time to first fixate the body. For correlations where one variable was not normally distributed both Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s (rs) analyses were conducted and reported. Partial correlations are based on Pearson’s correlation regardless of distribution. All tests are two-tailed.
Show
After pre-handling had took place, the interest path data is looked to possess outliers (data facts bigger than step 1.five times new interquartile assortment to have confirmed changeable), of the investigating boxplots. The new rural investigation factors (letter = 19) were excluded getting private investigation items in eye-tracking measures , comprising 4.22% of your overall analysis.
Hypervigilance
No significant correlation was found between LSAS scores and time to first fixate the head r (16) = .101, p = .709 and the body r (21) = -.062, p = .790, (r s (21) = -.144, p = .522). This remained the case when controlling for state anxiety using a partial correlation, r (13) = .088, p = .754, and the body r (18) = -.070, p = .7710
502, p = .034 (Fig dos) (overlooking county anxiety) and r (15) = -.499, p = .041 (controlling getting county anxiety).
There clearly was zero high dating between LSAS scores and you will very first fixation years toward body, r (23) = -.141, p = .521 that has been and the case when managing getting condition anxiety having fun with a partial correlation roentgen (20) = -.133, p =. 556
(閱讀全文…)